Producer responsibility
Helena Nylén in meeting with EU Commissioner Jessika Roswall
There were constructive and positive discussions on producer responsibility when the Näringslivets Producentansvar met with EU Commissioner Jessika Roswall this week.On Tuesday, Helena Nylén, CEO of Näringslivets Producentansvar, met with EU Commissioner Jessika Roswall to discuss producer responsibility, policy instruments, and the conditions needed to increase recycling in the EU. The meeting was characterized by open and constructive dialogue.
“The Commissioner was well-prepared and genuinely interested in the challenges within the system, and it was a very good discussion,” says Helena Nylén.
During the meeting, Helena highlighted several key points:
- Long-term rules of the game for investment
Achieving EU recycling targets requires significant investments in collection, sorting, and recycling capacity. However, the current situation – where producer responsibility organizations in several countries mainly compete on price – creates short-termism and discourages investment. Helena also warned about the risk that “price competition at any cost” may incentivize questionable practices for disposing of waste.
- Stronger transparency and governance within EPR systems
NPA welcomes clearer regulatory requirements to ensure that producer fees are used for their intended purpose: financing collection and recycling, rather than contributing to profit distribution or short-term competitive advantages.
- EPR as a public service
Helena and her colleagues in EXPRA also emphasized the importance of recognizing EPR systems as services of general economic interest. This would give Member States better conditions to build stable and well-functioning systems aligned with EU objectives.
- Reasonable costs for producers – and households
Sweden is facing major cost increases as property-based collection expands. Helena underlined that producer responsibility must mean producers pay for efficient and necessary costs – not for rising expenses they cannot control or influence.
- Reliable and harmonized waste data
Finally, the meeting touched on the importance of robust waste statistics. As costs and EU penalties increase, pressure on national reporting also grows. This makes harmonized and reliable statistics essential for transparency and fairness between Member States.
Helena participated as part of EXPRA’s delegation. Beyond the Swedish perspective, the purpose of the meeting was also to reaffirm EPR as the financial backbone of a circular packaging economy. EXPRA further called for inclusion in EU-level crisis discussions, highlighted national best practices (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Sweden), addressed challenges such as multi-PRO systems and state intervention, and advocated for recognizing EPR as a service of general economic interest with strong industry-led governance.
More Producer responsibility
Why is it so important that each packaging material can be source‑separated and recycled in clean material streams?
The answer is that, for packaging to be considered suitable for high-quality material recycling, the materials must be easy to separate. Materials should not be mixed or contaminated by other material types and should preferably be made from mono-materials. Watch the film to learn what to consider when designing packaging for maximum material recycling.
English report summary now available
Now there is an English summary of the report "Will Sweden reach the recycling targets for packaging 2030?"
Costly and counterproductive proposal risks increasing waste
The EU is currently discussing the harmonisation of packaging labelling, with the aim of making it easier for consumers to sort their waste correctly. Unfortunately, the proposal risks being both costly and counterproductive – potentially leading to more waste.