Producer responsibility
Helena Nylén in meeting with EU Commissioner Jessika Roswall
There were constructive and positive discussions on producer responsibility when the Näringslivets Producentansvar met with EU Commissioner Jessika Roswall this week.On Tuesday, Helena Nylén, CEO of Näringslivets Producentansvar, met with EU Commissioner Jessika Roswall to discuss producer responsibility, policy instruments, and the conditions needed to increase recycling in the EU. The meeting was characterized by open and constructive dialogue.
“The Commissioner was well-prepared and genuinely interested in the challenges within the system, and it was a very good discussion,” says Helena Nylén.
During the meeting, Helena highlighted several key points:
- Long-term rules of the game for investment
Achieving EU recycling targets requires significant investments in collection, sorting, and recycling capacity. However, the current situation – where producer responsibility organizations in several countries mainly compete on price – creates short-termism and discourages investment. Helena also warned about the risk that “price competition at any cost” may incentivize questionable practices for disposing of waste.
- Stronger transparency and governance within EPR systems
NPA welcomes clearer regulatory requirements to ensure that producer fees are used for their intended purpose: financing collection and recycling, rather than contributing to profit distribution or short-term competitive advantages.
- EPR as a public service
Helena and her colleagues in EXPRA also emphasized the importance of recognizing EPR systems as services of general economic interest. This would give Member States better conditions to build stable and well-functioning systems aligned with EU objectives.
- Reasonable costs for producers – and households
Sweden is facing major cost increases as property-based collection expands. Helena underlined that producer responsibility must mean producers pay for efficient and necessary costs – not for rising expenses they cannot control or influence.
- Reliable and harmonized waste data
Finally, the meeting touched on the importance of robust waste statistics. As costs and EU penalties increase, pressure on national reporting also grows. This makes harmonized and reliable statistics essential for transparency and fairness between Member States.
Helena participated as part of EXPRA’s delegation. Beyond the Swedish perspective, the purpose of the meeting was also to reaffirm EPR as the financial backbone of a circular packaging economy. EXPRA further called for inclusion in EU-level crisis discussions, highlighted national best practices (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Sweden), addressed challenges such as multi-PRO systems and state intervention, and advocated for recognizing EPR as a service of general economic interest with strong industry-led governance.
More Producer responsibility
Three quick questions to Bengt Lagerman
Bengt Lagerman is the Chair of the Board at Näringslivets Producentansvar (NPA) and has a long background in the packaging and recycling industry.
Sweden fails to meet packaging recycling targets
Despite stricter requirements for collection and recycling, Sweden appears set to miss the EU’s packaging recycling targets for 2030. Plastic packaging, in particular, is falling far short of the 55 per cent recycling goal. This is revealed in a new report in which Näringslivets Producentansvar (NPA) analyses what is needed to reach the targets.
Response: The Efficiency of Municipalities Determines the Cost of Collection
The cost per collected kilo and the volume of collected packaging vary significantly between municipalities, writes Henrik Nilsson from Näringslivets Producentansvar in a response in Dagens Samhälle.